Behind the Poll
There is much debate surrounding whether or not the Clinton Foundation should be audited. Some say that the Foundation is a way for the Clintons to skirt around campaign finance laws and use their influence to gain favor with powerful people. Others argue that the Foundation does a lot of good work and that any financial irregularities are due to simple mistakes.
Critics of the Clinton Foundation point to the fact that it has accepted donations from foreign governments and corporations while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. They argue that this creates a conflict of interest, as these donors could be trying to influence U.S. policy. The Foundation has also been accused of misspending funds, with some of the money going to pay for the Clintons’ lavish lifestyle. Supporters of an audit say that it would help to clear up any suspicion of wrongdoing.
Supporters of the Clinton Foundation argue that it is a well-respected charity that does a lot of good work. They point out that foreign governments and corporations have been donating to the Foundation for years, and there is no evidence that Hillary Clinton has ever used her influence to help them. They also argue that any financial irregularities are due to simple mistakes, and an audit would not find anything wrong.
It is clear that there are valid arguments on both sides of this issue. However, given the amount of suspicion and accusations surrounding the Clinton Foundation, it seems prudent to call for an audit. This would help to clear up any wrongdoing and restore public confidence in the Foundation.
